Featured Post

Axiata Group Conroversy: A Policital solution or a corruption at its best

On December 1, Axiata the telecmooouncation giant  announced its exist from Ncell with sale and purchase agreement (SPA) with Spectrlite UK ...

Activism vs Act



In my opinion its human rights to oppose or to have a freedom of speech or freedom of expression(FoE) in or against any topic of interest, which is perfectly your personal choice. But to implement and carry that person's expression in a more coordinated and cognitive process of  following a definite series of action with an intention is something which needs to be understood and realized.

One thing we all have to understand is expression and action are variably different forms of communication. Expression majorly represents a  cognitive process with no intentional where as an act represent a series of expression or result of expressions.

Under any law or legal parameters it is not defined for a voice or opinion to be illegal, until and unless  the act is  causing a definite harm or distress in others persons life or cultural harmony or any sort of repercussions.

I think criminalization of FoE is yet another issue of debate where most of the government practice a non  lenient approach. In fact it has become a tool of choice for the government for censorship but just by saying something or sharing something against a person in Social Media, is something of a different nature which needs to look at it from a different angle.

I am a strong believe of activism and I believe people should have the right to protest but that right should not object the right to legality, or in any way marginalize others well being. I am not in support of suppression or vague definition of legality as  manipulated  by the  government but to a safer side I think its your choice of being expressive in a more conclusive manner of whether you want to make your point or  whether you want to cause an impact.

What I mean to say is, it should be subjected to an expression a voice not a series of action or act, if it portrays a form of any means then legally it is thought to be of a cognitive process with intention which is defined illegal.

Specially in the coming generation of leaders and activists,  I see a lot of confusion regarding practicing their right to defend their FoE. In today's world where internet has revolutionized everything people's core values are also changing. The evolution process has justified the various aspect of communication and other process in terms of practicing where the definition of legality needs to adjust as per the change. Having said that I am not looking for a radical change. I just want to practice open standards in terms of what is applicable and understandable.






Previous
Next Post »

Please leave your suggestion and Advice

I will get back to you as soon as possible

Shreedeep Rayamajhi ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon

Featured Posts